Scientists at the CDC have been manipulating data from Covid-19

Scientists at the CDC have been manipulating data from Covid-19

COVID-19 vaccinations have been linked to six times more deaths from all causes than unvaccinated people, according to recent data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS).1

However, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is bolstering the official narrative with a “experiment”2 that found COVID vaccinations reduce your risk of death from all causes, including accidents (but excluding COVID-19-related deaths). This is what CNN Health had to say about it on October 22nd, 2021: 3

“The research team was trying to demonstrate that the three authorized Covid-19 vaccines are safe and they say their findings clearly demonstrate that. ‘Recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Janssen vaccines had lower non-COVID-19 mortality risk than did the unvaccinated comparison groups,’ the researchers wrote in the weekly report4 of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The team studied 6.4 million people who had been vaccinated against Covid-19 and compared them to 4.6 million people who had received flu shots in recent years but who had not been vaccinated against coronavirus.

They filtered out anyone who had died from Covid-19 or after a recent positive coronavirus test … People who got two doses of Pfizer vaccines were 34% as likely to die of non-coronavirus causes in the following months as unvaccinated people, the study found.

People who got two doses of Moderna vaccine were 31% as likely to die as unvaccinated people, and those who got Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine were 54% as likely to die …”

People who received the Janssen vaccine had a higher death rate than those who did not receive the vaccine, and researchers admitted that they had manipulated the data to show that the vaccines were safe and effective (54 percent likelihood, compared to the unvaxxed).

CDC

Taking the Shots, Does It Make a Difference in Terms of Overall Mortality?

The researchers believe that people who receive the COVID injection may be healthier overall and lead healthier lifestyles than those who avoid it. Because most of the brainwashed don’t understand the basic principles for healthy behavior, I believe this is classic Orwellian doublespeak.”

Because they only looked at data through May 31, 2021, I suspect that their new propaganda has more to do with that. An estimated 31 percent of American adults had received one or more vaccinations by mid-April. 5 Only 48.7 percent had been “vaccinated” as of June 15. 6 By the end of May, we can assume that about 45 percent or so of eligible Americans had been double jabbed, if not more, by then.

Because this is exactly how the CDC invented the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” myth, where they claimed 99 percent of COVID-19 deaths and 95 percent of COVID-related hospitalizations were occurring among the unvaccinated, I suspect statistical tomfoolery.7

The CDC used hospitalization and mortality data from January to June of 2021 to arrive at these results, a period in which those who had received vaccinations were still a minority.

When vaccination rates were low, they once again used a seven-month period. The cutoff date, however, obscures a rapid increase in vaccine-related deaths reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

Using data from the OpenVAERS mortality reports page, I point to the graph below. 8 As you can see, the number of deaths linked to the COVID vaccine shot peaked at the beginning of April 2021 and then declined throughout the month. Since April 13, 2021, the daily vaccination rate has dropped by 78 percent, according to a new study.

While the daily vaccination rate has dropped since April and reported deaths have remained high and steady, the number of vaccines administered has decreased significantly. People who received vaccines earlier in the year may be dying as a result of those vaccines.

In December 2020 and January 2021, only 0.5 percent of the United States population received a COVID vaccine, so comparing the death rates of the vaccinated and unvaccinated may not be all that useful. It would be better if we included the months of July through September in the analysis.

The months saw a marked increase in reported deaths compared to December and January. Between September 3, 2021, and October 22, 2021, the total reported death toll increased from 7,6629,10 to 17,619.11; this graph does not show this increase. In other words, the CDC’s analysis didn’t take into account the fact that it increased by more than double in just seven weeks.

In addition, the authors acknowledge that “the findings may not be applicable to the general population,” despite the study’s size and sociodemographic diversity.

Also, remember that the definition of “vaccinated” has been expanded to include those who have received two doses of the vaccine within the last two weeks (for two-dose regimens). According to this, tens of millions of people received one or more vaccinations but were not considered “vaccinated.”

In 2021, why will there be an increase in all-cause mortality?

Between January and August 2021, the all-cause mortality rate in the United States rose by 16 percent over 2018, the year with the highest all-cause mortality before COVID, and 18 percent over the average death rate between 2015 and 2019. The mortality rate in 2021 is 16% higher than the average and 14% higher than the 2018 mortality rate when population growth is taken into account.

After the introduction of COVID vaccines in December 2020, why did more people die in the first eight months of the following year? Regardless of mass vaccination, was COVID-19 responsible for an increase in the death toll?

A two-part series by Matthew Crawford of the Rounding the Earth Newsletter examined mortality rates before and after the introduction of the COVID vaccines. In his findings in Part 1,14, he stated that in the first 30 days of the European vaccination campaign, the shots had killed an estimated 1,018 people for every million doses administered (note, these are doses, not individual vaccines).

In two manipulated studies, the CDC has set a low new standard
In two manipulated studies, the CDC has set a low new standard

It’s possible that between 800,000 and 2 million of the so-called ‘COVID-19 deaths’ are actually COVID vaccine-related deaths.

He came up with an estimate of 200 to 500 deaths per million doses administered after adjusting for deaths categorized as COVID-19 deaths. Approximately 800,000 to 2 million of the so-called “COVID-19 deaths” may actually be vaccine-induced deaths, given that 4 billion doses have been administered worldwide. Crawford explains it this way:15

“This does not even include vaccine-induced deaths that have not been recorded as COVID cases, though I suspect that latter number is smaller since the only good way to hide the vaccine mortality signal is to smuggle deaths through the already-established COVID death toll.”

At a time when only 40,000 Norwegians had received the COVID jab, Crawford’s calculations are supported by data from Norway. 575 deaths per million doses administered is the mortality rate. Furthermore, autopsies performed on 13 of these deaths revealed that they were all directly related to the COVID vaccine.16

The Exposé exclusively revealed how data had been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real-world study for the CDC to show that Covid-19 vaccines were safe for use during pregnancy.

Written by THE EXPOSÉ ON OCTOBER 31, 2021
Excerpts from the article:

The authors claimed that the number of people to suffer a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) during the study was 104 out of 827 completed pregnancies, equating the risk of miscarriage at 12.6%; 7 – 12% lower than the risk of miscarriage in the general population.

However, our analysis proved that these numbers were extremely misleading due to the fact that of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of a pregnancy.

Therefore, the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late, because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world.

Why Do So Many People Die from the COVID Jab?

Crawford then examines data from countries where vaccine uptake is high but COVID-19 prevalence is low. A better understanding of whether the COVID jabs are to blame for the increase in deaths can be gained from this method.

A total of 23 countries, accounting for approximately one-quarter of the world’s population, were found to meet these criteria. These countries had a total of 103.2 COVID-related deaths per million residents prior to the COVID jabs. COVID deaths per million in five countries were more than 200 per million, while seven countries had fewer than 10 per million deaths.

More than a quarter of the people in these 23 countries had received a COVID vaccination as of August 1, 2021; 10% were considered fully vaccinated. In all, 673 million doses were given out.. Crawford estimates that the excess death rate per million vaccine doses is 411, which is well within the 200 to 500 range he predicted in Part 1 based on this data.

Steve Kirsch, the executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, performed yet another fascinating data dive. There are more than 300,000 Americans who may have died from COVID injections, as he argues in the video “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,”17 which uses VAERS data to show how. 18 As many as 2 million to 5 million people have also been harmed.

Randolph AFB, TX, 27 Aug 11: Imune Patients copy (U.S. Air Force illustration/Samuel Lutcher) (released)

What Can We Learn from the VAERS Data?

According to Jessica Rose, PhD, a biochemist and applied mathematician with degrees in applied mathematics and immunology, the VAERS data can tell us a lot about the safety of COVID injections.

When it comes to vaccine side effects, Rose explains how the Bradford Hill Criteria can be used to assess causality and the problem of under-reporting. You can download a copy of Rose’s slide show here. 19 Following is a rundown of the main points raised during the course of the interview:

There were between 25,408 and 49,412 VAERS reports for vaccines between 2011 and 2020. COVID shots were introduced in 2021, and as of September 3, 2021, there were 521,667 VAERS reports for those shots alone. As of October 22, 2021, there have been 837,593.20 COVID-related adverse events reported.

Between 2011 and 2020, VAERS received reports of 120 to 183 deaths. In 2021, the reported death toll had reached 7,662 as of September 3. The death toll stood at 17,619 as of October 22, 2021. 21

There have never been a greater number of reports of cardiovascular, neurological, and immunological adverse events than there are now.

The estimated underreporting (URF) is 31. “ COVID vaccines have been linked with 205,809 deaths, including Bell’s palsy (81,747), herpes zoster infection (149,017), paresthesia (305,660), breakthrough COVID (365,955), myalgia (528,457), life-threatening events (230,113), and permanent disabilities (212,698), as of August 27, 2021. Birth defects have been linked to 7,998.

It meets all of the Bradford Hill Causing Criteria. Reproducibility and specificity are also important considerations, as are the strength of the relationship between dose and response and the size and scope of the effect.

The CDC asserts that the COVID vaccine outperforms natural immunity.

Prepare to have your hopes dashed even further by the CDC’s claim that the COVID vaccine lowers all-cause mortality, which is just the latest in a long line of Orwellian doublespeak. On October 29, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released yet another study claiming that the COVID jab protects against COVID-19 five times better than natural immunity. By Alex Berenson in a Substack article published October 30, 2021:22

“Yesterday the Centers for Disease Control, America’s not-at-all-politicized public health agency, released a new study purporting to show that vaccination protects against COVID infection better than natural immunity. Of course, a wave of stories about the benefits of mRNA vaccination followed.

At least four times as many people who were fully vaccinated as those who had natural immunity were admitted to the hospital with Covid, according to the CDC, and FIFTY TIMES as many over the summer. I’m serious.

In addition, the study contradicts a much larger paper published in August by Israeli researchers. In the words of my two-year-old son, “How dey do that??” There is no doubt in my mind that the Israeli study used a meaningful dataset to draw meaningful conclusions.

It counted infections (and hospitalizations) in a large group of previously infected people against an equally large and balanced group of vaccinated people, and then moderately adjusted for clearly defined risk factors.

Vaccinated people had a 13-fold increased risk of infection and a 7-fold increased risk of hospitalization compared to unvaccinated people with natural immunity, according to the study. What I mean is that, had the CDC not been under such intense political pressure to get people immunized, its research would never have been published.

Sophisticated Data Manipulation: A CDC Specialty

As Berenson explains, the study in question is “bizarre,” and he begins by dissecting its design. Analysis of data from nearly 200,000 Americans hospitalized with “COVID-like” illness between January and August 2021 in nine states was conducted by CDC analysts. Following that, the following two groups were compared:

who had been diagnosed with CIV at least 90 days prior to their hospitalization and received another COVID test at that time

Patients admitted to the hospital who had been fully vaccinated for at least 90 days prior to their admission and received a COVID test at the time of their hospitalization are eligible for this benefit.

What Berenson points out is that if you choose the right time and date, you can make your photos look better than they really are. As we now know, the shots stop working after only a few months, so they’re aiming for the best-case scenario by including a 90- to 180-day inclusion period. So, they’re only looking at the period of time when the COVID shots are at their most effective.

Both those who have been vaccinated and those who have not been vaccinated are excluded from the study because of the 90-day rule. For those who have been vaccinated, Berenson does not address them; however, it is unlikely that anyone could have been fully vaccinated for at least 90 days prior to March. As a rule, most people were unvaccinated at the time.

Of the 200,000 people who were hospitalized between January and August, only 1,020 had previously documented COVID infections. According to Berenson:23,

COVID is unlikely to pose a threat to the U.S. population, given that at least 20% to 40% of the population will have had COVID by the spring of 2021, and this is an incredibly small percentage.

Only 89 out of the 1,020 people with natural immunity tested positive for COVID, while 324 out of the 6,328 people who were vaccinated and met the study criteria did. Two things are worth mentioning:

1) Vaccinated patients were more likely than those with natural immunity to be hospitalized for a COVID-like illness, even when vaccination rates were low.

2) Vaccinated patients were more likely to experience a relapse of their infection than those who had developed their own immunity.

Vaccinated, Hospitalization Rate Is Soaring.

Berenson goes on to say.24

“And the CDC didn’t have, or didn’t publish, figures on how many people were actually in the two groups … Instead it compared the PERCENTAGE OF POSITIVE TESTS in the two groups. But why would the percentage of positive tests matter, when we don’t know how many people were actually at risk? …

[A]mazingly, the statistical manipulation then got even worse. The natural immunity group had an 8.7% positive test rate. The fully vaccinated group had a 5.1% positive test rate. So the natural immunity group was about 1.7 times as likely to test positive. (1.7x 5.1 = about 8.7.)

With such a small number of people in the natural immunity group, that raw ‘rate ratio’ may well have failed to reach statistical significance. (We don’t know, because the CDC didn’t provide an unadjusted odds ratio with 95% boundaries — something I have never seen before in any paper.)

There was instead only one risk ratio that had been adjusted for a variety of factors, including ‘facility characteristics [and] sociodemographic characteristics.’

Finally, the CDC’s researchers were able to publish a number: Hospitalized patients who had previously been infected were five times more likely to have a positive COVID test than those who had been fully vaccinated. The second group had four times as many people as the first. Science!

In case you missed it, the report’s data is tucked away at the very bottom. In addition to that, it’s terrible. For pre- and post-Delta, the CDC categorizes the hospitalizations based on the months of January to June and June to August, respectively.

Over the summer, the number of people with natural immunity who were hospitalized dropped significantly as Delta began flying. In the winter and spring, about 14 people were hospitalized each month, compared to six per month from June to August. Remember that this is a large sample of hospitals from nine states.)

But the number of VACCINATED people being hospitalized soared — from about three a month during the spring to more than 100 a month during the Delta period. These vaccinated people still were less than 180 days from their second dose, so they should have been at or near maximum immunity — suggesting that Delta, and not the time effect, played an important role in the loss of protection the vaccine offered.”

Perhaps Rep. Thomas Massie’s tweet:25 best sums it up.

“What do ‘road kill’ and a CDC sponsored COVID paper have in common? By the third day, they’re so picked apart they’re unrecognizable. This CDC Director is shameless for fabricating junk science with findings that stand in stark contrast to every credible academic study.”

According to Massie, the study has a number of obvious flaws and questions that need to be addressed.

Additionally, Massie points out that this six-page paper has an astonishing 50 authors, and at least half of them disclose conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies. Isn’t working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) a conflict of interest because Congress gave the CDC $1 billion to publicize the COVID jab?

Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff, PhD, a biostatistician and epidemiologist in the Division of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, also criticized the study on Twitter, writing:28

A major statistical flaw in this CDC study and the 5x conclusion is incorrect, it implicitly assumes that hospitalized respiratory patients are representative of the population, which they are not. As a means of establishing a dialogue with authors,”

The Best Answer Is to Build Your Own Natural Immunity.

Natural immunity is superior and longer-lasting than vaccine-induced immunity, no matter how hard the CDC tries to twist the facts. Another long-held medical fact has been thrown out of COVID-19 as too inconvenient.

The government wants everyone to receive the COVID injection, regardless of whether or not it is medically necessary. The sheer absurdity of it is enough to make you hesitant and delay the risky jab. You know what? This policy has nothing to do with protecting public health because it’s pushing public health in the wrong direction.

Natural herd immunity is the only way to stop this pandemic, and we have no reason to be concerned about COVID-19 at this time. Overall, it has the same lethality as the flu. 29,30,31,32,33 You have a 99.74 percent chance of beating COVID-19 if you’re not in a nursing home or have a number of other health issues. 34

Many early treatment protocols are effective, such as the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance I-MASK+35 protocol, the Zelenko protocol,36 and nebulized peroxidation, as detailed in Dr. David Brownstein’s case paper37 and free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery,” by Dr. Thomas Levy.37 In any case, you should begin treatment as soon as possible, ideally at the time of first symptoms.

If you’ve been injured by a COVID-19 shot and you live in the United States, your only recourse is to file a claim for compensation under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Act, which covers vaccines that have been recalled (CICP).38

CICP compensation is extremely limited and difficult to obtain. To be eligible, an injury that requires hospitalization and results in significant disability or death must be severe enough to necessitate hospitalization and the use of private health insurance.

Only lost wages and unpaid medical bills are eligible for compensation for pain and suffering. The CICP’s decision cannot be appealed, and salary compensation is limited to $50,000 per year.

A paper authored by Dr Greg Nigh and Stephanie Seneff, 39 “Worse than the disease: Reviewing some possible unintended consequences of the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19,” is also available to help you better understand the potential harm.