Nobody can prove viruses exist
- Personally, I am convinced by the evidence and have concluded that “rona” exists, but I am not certain about covid.
- I lost trust in doctors over 30 years ago and had no faith in them telling us the truth about genetic vaccines or viruses, so I decided to investigate for myself.
- Lanka has a theory that appears to explain why there has been no sign of a pandemic, but he has no evidence to back it up, and there is a mountain of evidence to suggest he is significantly wrong about the majority of his claims.
- When we consider the numerous years spent addressing the issue of mass vaccination, there is ample evidence that viruses grown in cell cultures and added to vaccines can cause more harm than good, as well as evidence of how they cause that harm.
- There is so much to say about the virus’s design and its relationship to the vax and the Reset!
- In many ways, the “ronascam” thrives on our ignorance. It was obvious the normies would go along with it all, happy to swallow the TV and internet narratives. This is difficult for activists and critical thinkers because there is so much to deal with and so much science involved!
Nobody can prove viruses exist (or not)
The ronascam’s success depends on our ignorance. It was obvious that the normies would swallow it all, content to watch TV and surf the internet in their own little bubble. But activists and critical thinkers face an uphill battle, partly due to the volume of issues and partly due to the science involved!
People’s interest in viruses, genetics, and technical terms and concepts waned over time. Videos on BitChute proved viruses don’t exist, freeing time for hydra, nanotechnology, and graphene research. The technocrats knew we’d struggle to explain genetic vaccines and would likely adopt the no-virus theory to account for the absence of disease.
So, what do you think? That is why I am showing you what I found, sharing my thoughts, and trying to broaden the field of inquiry. In this article, I will ask you to consider how we will ever determine whether viruses exist or not, as well as what happens to cells and what particles emerge from them. (How do we know atoms and stars exist?)
As a result, you will likely lack evidence to support your claim, which will tarnish our movement, ii) justify censorship, and iii) reinforce the normies’ belief system.
However, times have changed, and time is of the essence. I am confident in my bold claims because I have done extensive research and written articles explaining various concepts WITH PRIMARY SOURCES. I am convinced by the evidence that rona exists, but not sure about covid.
While Covid’s statistics are largely meaningless, other evidence suggests it is not much worse than the flu in terms of how it affects people, and that it primarily affects the elderly and sick, but not children. In fact, the silent hospitals and death statistics show that any aspect of the evil Reset is sufficient evidence.
To put an end to this madness, I’ve damaged my eyes and slept for days. I lost faith in doctors over 30 years ago and didn’t trust them to tell the truth about genetic vaccines or viruses, so I did my own research. A article was published in May 2021, “Episode 117: The Missing Virus that Created a New Disease with Dr Andrew Kaufman” and I devoured it as soon as it was published.
I thought it was reasonable at the time, and I tried to find evidence to back up Dr Andrew Kaufman and his crew’s claims. So it’s up to me to be as honest as possible and deliver my findings so you can verify and weigh them for yourself. Unless you’re too busy researching anti-virus theorists’ evidence…
If that’s the case, can someone convince me that “viruses exist because virologists create them using cell cultures and use them to create vaccines” is incorrect? What do they have if not a virus?
To clarify, a virus is a small protein chunk that can interact with our genetics and the genetics of microbes in our bodies. Researchers estimate that thousands of viruses exist, many of which are found inside us, and most of which are completely harmless – so DO NOT CONFUSE THE ALLEGED VIRUS WITH THE ALLEGED DISEASE. That’s why I’ve capitalized and bolded it!
- Viruses can exist without causing disease.
- Others may occasionally infect some people.
- Animal experiments can be eliminated by using viruses that are genetically engineered to be more harmful to that animal. Example: MA15 coronavirus for mice (Ralph Baric).
While I agree that viruses are grown in strange and nasty cell cultures, I believe that an isolate is a fairly close copy of some of the stuff that comes out of people’s cells. In part because I am not a geneticist, but mostly because these techniques are used to sequence the genomes of other organisms, including humans! While RT-PCR is widely used by researchers and appears to be reliable, the public cannot rely on it. No way. They’re part of the ruse.
It’s time to do more research! Either way, you should be able to point people in the right direction for evidence to support your claims, so they can do their own research.
The no-virus theory’s flaws
Discussion with Stefan Lanka
When it comes to animal experiments, they can be eliminated through the use of viruses that have been genetically engineered to be more harmful to that particular animal. Ralph Baric’s MA15 coronavirus for mice is an excellent example.
Anti-covidians, however, did not believe everything they were told about the rona/covid combination. They looked for an explanation and found a marine biologist named Stefan Lanka. He criticizes the medical model and vaccine use, then connects them to the ronascam. But he doesn’t have any evidence to back up his claims, and there’s plenty to suggest Lanka is wrong about most of his claims.
Dr Tom Cowan and Dr Robert Young are two doctors who have promoted Lanka’s theories, but the man with the largest following appears to be Dr Andrew Kaufman, a forensic psychiatrist who initially claimed coronavirus vaccines could genetically modify people.
Soon after Dr Cowan, published The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (Including “Coronavirus”) Are Not the Cause of Disease, reiterating Lanka’s isolation claims and Koch’s postulates.
These echoes seem to have reached a consensus among activists. A virus has never been isolated, so whatever comes out of cells is simply dying cell particles. But no-virus theorists have yet to:
- verify any of their claims
- separate ‘virus existence’ from ‘disease existence’
- give acceptable isolates examples
- justification for rejecting CCI
- Justify why viruses must be identical in size.
- Define “typical artifacts of dying tissues/cells.” and describe the instruments used to verify this.
- explain non-CPE or non-disease viruses in their theories
- justification for ignoring virologists’ evidence, such as the appearance of various viral particles (the results of which can be replicated)
- elucidate microbiome function
- Identify the ingredients in vaccines and how they have harmed people.
- Describe a viral vector used in AstraZeneca and J&J DIY vax kits.
- recognize genetic sequencing
THIS IS A VIRUS ARGUMENT! Dr Kauffman vs Dr Mikovitz
It’s a Lie Fund aka Isolate Truth Fund
Anti-virus theorists make no attempt to substantiate their claims, instead of demanding that virologists show the existence of an isolated virus. This includes “documented control experiments” that show the virus’s existence, as well as “a virologist who presents scientific proof of the existence of a coronavirus.”
Why can’t we get over it?
It’s impossible to prove something’s existence. Anyone can present evidence, but the challengers make it clear that they will reject all available evidence because they question the majority of virologists’ tools and procedures.
It’s unlikely they’d accept anything from a cell culture, as most people believe any isolate from a cell culture is invalid. “Let them isolate and photograph viruses in blood or saliva samples,” Lanka asserts.
- Because genetic sequencing is considered fraudulent, it may be ruled inadmissible as evidence.
- No virologists’ evidence-gathering tools or tests are acceptable because they “provide no meaning or significance.”
- Skeptics believe existence can be proven.
How can we know what comes out of cells if we can’t prove their existence using genetic sequencing, electron microscopy, or cultured isolates? That the culture media (fetal bovine serum, DMEM, and antibiotics) caused the particles seen emerging from cells is disputed. What methods did they use to find out? On video, Lanka shows a cell culture treated with 10 percent FBS, then reduced to 1 percent FBS while increasing the amount of antibiotics. In this case, the yeast RNA could have created a cytopathic effect when it reacted with the AbAm, which is an antibiotic that works against both fungus and bacteria.
The language is imprecise (how are “experiments of steps” conducted?, what does “coronavirus” mean?) So the goal is unclear for virologists. Another possibility is that the challenge will follow Lanka’s ‘prove measles exists’ award, which required all proof to be contained in one “publication.”
We’ll need to agree on terms like “existence” and “virus” if we’re ever going to solve this. The challengers should define their terms, preferably with examples of what they believe is ‘correct.’ How does an isolate look? How would we know if one was found?
To argue that virologists are misinterpreting what does exist, the Isolate Truth Fund team uses Lanka’s theory. A dying cell particle is what virologists see, not a virus:
‘Virologists accidentally kill cells in test tubes, thinking it’s proof of virus presence. Virologists can only fake a gene sequence by mentally assembling fragments of dying cells. As a result, the test procedures are meaningless. In the electron microscope, dying cell structures look like viruses. Such structures have never been seen in a human before!”
Microscopes can image particles, implying that they do not deny their existence. ‘Convince us that the particles visible through microscopes have a different identity than the particles emerging from poisoned cells.’ Do you think so? And how will we ever find out?
Tools of the Trade
To be clear, I am not endorsing the study of viruses by virologists employed by Big Pharma. But I think we should use virologists’ tools to learn more about viruses, exosomes, blebs, and other necrotic cell structures.
We must carefully scrutinize their findings and interpretations because the industry is clearly devoted to vaccine promotion and production. They almost certainly have the tools because there is no level playing field!
People without similar technology have a harder time proving alternative theories about the body. Using what is available to learn more is one way the medical model maintains its dominance, but that does not mean we cannot benefit from the studies that have been conducted.
Not only viruses are difficult to ‘prove’, but also the universe, atoms, and time. Scientists simply piece together evidence for these things, as they do with viruses. Virologists and microbiologists use many tools and techniques:
These include plaque formation assays for infectious viruses on cultured mammalian cells, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for viral proteins, PCR amplification of viral genomes, and optical microscopy of single viral particles.
No one can prove existence.
Understanding these tools’ limitations – their benefits and drawbacks – is critical to understanding the results they produce. So we just need to look at the evidence because “It’s impossible to prove anything in science… Observable quantities are all we have to guide us empirically. Those numbers are only as accurate as the tools and equipment used to make them.”
“Prove it‘ is a jocular phrase. But you rarely ask a friend to prove a point you disagree with. Science has no proof. It encourages you to develop a hypothesis, collect data, and test it.
Repeating this process brings you closer to the truth, but it never proves a hypothesis. This is impossible because you would need to collect all data in the universe to test your hypothesis. Even then, your measurements will be off. New data and improved measurement instruments will always be added to the scientific body of knowledge.”
“Asking you to “prove the existence of something” is a bad idea. It’s like asking for the axioms before proving any theory. All proof requires axioms. ….. A question like, “How can I prove something exists?” must be contextualized. What evidence will they accept?
It can be answered simply by stating that something is the object of our senses: I can see, touch, smell, and taste this apple. For example, I cannot prove Australia’s existence by sensing it because it is so far away, but I can show photographs, books, people who have visited, beer brewed there, etc.
If the questioner responds, but that is only evidence, not incontrovertible proof, he is engaging in a game of radical skepticism. One can be skeptical of other minds, leading to solipsism; skeptical of the past, believing that the entire universe came into existence a few seconds ago with all my memories performed; or skeptical of everything, following Descartes. One can only conclude that such skepticism is pointless or unhelpful if it cannot be proven otherwise.
This broad accusation implies that there is no point in investigating the evidence, which is unhelpful.
Why is this important?
Because confident conspiracy theorists thoroughly investigate all evidence.
Why? Because anti-covidians are blamed for not trusting authority. We insist on using science correctly, so we should be able to show that “toxic chemicals added to cell cultures cause the particles.”
Doctors, like other experts, are untrustworthy.
There is ample evidence that viruses grown in cell cultures and added to vaccines can cause more harm than good, as well as evidence of how they cause that harm. The evidence on HOW TO BE HEALTHY is also overwhelming. Example: Dr. Weston Price‘s research on the effects of the “Three White Devils” on people’s teeth.
Researchers have also been busy sequencing the genomes of microbes that live inside us, many of which have a significant impact on humans! Because technocrats are already fascinated by microbes (think Bill Gates and sewage), the plan appears to be to patent nature at every level of existence.
Not convinced that technocrats would prefer you deny the existence or effect of all microbes? How about the fact that the rona appears to be human-made? So if technocrats created the virus to fit their pre-made vaccines, they should spread the no-virus theory and hide the long history of genetic vaccines.
Moreover, the vax was clearly prepared for the rona. Definitely.
So much to say about the virus’s design, the vax, and the Reset! For example, the furin cleavage site in the spike’s middle was exactly what the NIH’s S2P vax design required. That is exactly what is happening now.