No One Knows How A War On A Virus Has Become A War On The Unvaccinated
While no one knows how a war on a virus has become a war on the unvaccinated, there are all sorts of conjectures as to why. Oddly, no matter how you slice it, you come up with Bat Shit.
President Joe Biden has gone from waging a war on the virus to a war on the unvaccinated. The president is demonstrating the vaccine hold-outs as a source of disappointment, a risk to their fellow citizens, and a danger to the country’s financial recovery.
In doing so, the president is attempting to concentrate the anger of the country’s inoculated majority versus the persistent 25% of qualified Americans who remain unvaccinated.
What the Hell is going on? A trash dump has nothing on this stench. From Bat Soup to EcoHealth Alliance, to Gain of Function Research, to Dr. Fauci and the NIH, to President Biden saying he wouldn’t mandate vaccines for President Biden mandating vaccines, nothing appears to be, above board, and everything points to Mad Scientist Gone Wild.
Let’s begin with a couple of shady characters. Peter Daszak,
Emails obtained by the Freedom of Information Act request show that a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance.
EcoHealth Alliance is interestingly the same non-profit group that received millions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses from scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Dutch Virologist Ron Fouchier
Dutch Virologist Ron Fouchier created a mutant H5N1 Virus and is key to Coronavirus investigation.
Dutch Virologist Ron Fouchier is a controversial figure in the field of Viroscience. He created the world’s deadliest virus strain and his research sparked a global controversy to de-fund and shut down such experiments.
Experts have raised concerns legally that such experiments could not only lead to a global pandemic but could also lead to bioterrorism.
However, Ron Fouchier is also a key to the COVID-19 investigation. He isolated the SARS Coronavirus smuggled out of Saudi Arabia which was sent to Canadian scientist Frank Plummer, who ended up dead a week after GreatGameIndia’s report was published.
Michael Yeadon, a former chief science officer and vice president for Pfizer’s Respiratory Illness Research Division said, given the great numbers of “demonstrably false,” repetitious information now being given by governments and media, he had no choice but to conclude that the COVID crisis and mass vaccinations might be part of a “massive depopulation” program.
In recent months, Yeadon (pronounced Yee-don) has emerged as an unlikely hero of the so-called anti-vaxxers, whose adherents question the safety of lots of vaccines, not only the ones pertaining to the Coronavirus.
The anti-vaxxer movement has amplified Yeadon’s skeptical views about COVID-19 vaccines and tests, government-mandated lockdowns, and the arc of the pandemic. Yeadon has said he personally does not oppose using all vaccines.
Lots of health professionals and federal government officials stress that viewpoints like his fuel vaccine hesitancy — a hesitation or rejection to be immunized — might lengthen the pandemic. COVID-19 has actually currently killed more than 2.6 million individuals worldwide.
Long before that, scientists such as Dr. Judy Mikovits predicted up to 50 million Americans would die as a result of poorly-tested, mass vaccinations within a few years. The common thread is that it will all be blamed not on the mRNA injections, but on COVID “variants” and the “unvaccinated.”
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, who actively censors any questions about mRNA “vaccine” safety, was shown in a leaked video admitting that long-term side-effects were unknown. USA Today has reported that Facebook will not be requiring its employees to take the shots. At the same time, some scientists and former high-ranking US officials are saying that not only did COVID come from the Wuhan lab, but that it was deliberately released as an attack on the US.
According to U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy, if you’ve already recovered from a bout of COVID-19, the full-spectrum immunity installed by your body might not suffice to avoid reinfection with the Delta variation, so your best option is to get the COV … Jab,
According to U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy, if you’ve currently recuperated from a bout of COVID-19, the full-spectrum resistance installed by your body might not be sufficient to prevent reinfection with the Delta variation, so your best bet is to get the COVID shot. August 2021 he told CNN.
“… what we’ve understood, actually, from the studies about natural immunity, we are seeing more and more data that tells us that while you get some protection from natural infection, it’s not nearly as strong as what you get from the vaccine, especially with the Delta variant, which is the hardiest and most contagious variant we’ve seen to date. We need all the protection that we can get. That’s why the vaccines are so effective.”
Data Analysis Claims Unvaccinated, More Prone to Reinfection.
On August 6, 2021, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a case-control study claiming that unvaccinated individuals are “more than twice as likely to be reinfected with COVID-19 than those who were immunized after at first contracting the virus.”.
The research study used information reported to Kentucky’s National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 reinfection rates in Kentucky throughout May through June 2021 among those who’d had verified SARS-CoV-2 infections between March and December 2020.
The NEDSS information was then imported into a REDCap database that tracks new COVID-19 cases. The case patient was defined as a resident with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 and subsequent favorable test results throughout May 1, 2021, through June 30, 2021.
Vaccination status was identified utilizing information from the Kentucky Immunization Registry.
Patients were considered to be fully immunized if a single dosage of Johnson & Johnson or a second dosage of an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer or Moderna) had been administered at least 14 days before reinfection. Compared to fully vaccinated residents, unvaccinated homeowners were 2.34 times more likely to check positive for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection.
The Obvious Flaw in CDC’s Study.
The elephant in the China Shop, however, is the lack of real symptomatic health problems. The research study just took a look at positive test outcomes, and we do not know whether more vaccinated people were symptomatic than the unvaccinated, or vice versa.
As has often been described previously, a positive test outcome is not the same as an active infection. A person with natural resistance might be re-exposed to the virus, and traces of it might reveal upon screening, but their immune system has effectively eliminated the infection and avoided health problems.
So, simply looking at positive test results is not the finest way to establish whether the COVID jab offers better protection than natural resistance. And there are lots of reasons to presume it does not.
The study authors confess there are many other constraints to the findings, including the following:
“First, reinfection was not confirmed through whole genome sequencing, which would be necessary to definitively prove that the reinfection was caused from a distinct virus relative to the first infection …
Second, people who have been vaccinated are possibly less likely to get tested. Therefore, the association of reinfection and lack of vaccination might be overestimated.
Third, vaccine doses administered at federal or out-of-state sites are not typically entered into KYIR, so vaccination data are possibly missing for some persons in these analyzes …
Fourth, although case-patients and controls were matched based on age, sex, and date of initial infection, other unknown confounders might be present. Finally, this is a retrospective study designed using data from a single state during a 2-month period; therefore, these findings cannot be used to infer causation.”
Properly, the association does not relate to causation, and we’ve been consistently told to dismiss the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) information for this real factor. Perhaps the same standard ought to be used in this CDC examination, as it tells us extremely little about the actual danger related to reinfection.
For all we understand, those with natural resistance checked positive for reinfection but had no signs, while vaccinated people tested positive and were ill. Which, in that case, would be the more effective result?
Hospitalization and Mortality Rates Are a Better Gauge.
A far better gauge of how well COVID jabs are working would be serious infections, hospitalizations, and death rates, and when we look at those, a different image emerges.
In Israel, where vaccine uptake has been high due to limitations on flexibility for those who do not comply, the information shows that those who have received COVID jabs are 6.72 times more likely to get infected than individuals who have recovered from natural infection.
It all speaks for itself in the charts below. The red is unvaccinated, the yellow refers to partially “vaccinated” and green is fully “vaccinated” with two doses.
That too refers to check results, so let’s take a look at hospitalization rates instead. Here, we find a majority of serious cases and deaths are in reality happening among those injected with 2 doses.
Do not be deceived by claims that unvaccinated patients make up 99% of COVID-19 deaths and 95% of COVID-related hospitalizations in the United States.
Such statistics were, in fact, manufactured by taking a look at hospitalization and death data from January through June 2021 — an amount of time when COVID jab rates were low. January 1, 2021, just 0.5% of the U.S. population received a COVID shot, so plainly, unvaccinated it made up the bulk of COVID-related hospitalizations last winter season. By mid-April, an approximated 31% had received at least one shot, and as of June 30, just 46.9% were “totally vaccinated.”
Why COVID Shot Can Not End COVID Outbreaks.
In general, it does not look like though COVID-19 gene modification injections can efficiently remove COVID-19 breakouts, and this makes good sense, seeing how it’s mathematically difficult for them to do so.
Since the outright threat that needs to be gotten rid of is lower than the outright danger decrease these injections can offer, mass vaccination simply can not have a favorable effect, even with a vaccination rate of 100%.
The 4 readily available COVID shots in the U.S. provide an absolute risk reduction of between just 0.7% and 1.1%. (Efficacy rates of 67% to 95% all refer to the relative threat reduction.) On the other hand, the noninstitutionalized infection casualty ratio throughout age groups is a mere 0.26%.
Given that the absolute danger that needs to be conquered is lower than the outright threat that these injections can supply, mass vaccination merely can not have a favorable effect, even with a vaccination rate of 100%.
Don’t, believe the hype. There’s evidence. July 14, 2021, BBC News reported there’d been a break out on the British Defense carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth. Despite the whole team being injected, 100 crew members tested positive. (It’s unclear whether any of them had signs.).
The recent outbreak onboard a Carnival Cruise Line ship is another example. The entire team and guests had presented proof of being jabbed, yet that didn’t avoid an outbreak from happening.
The reason is elementary. Several pundits, including myself, have been telling you from the beginning that the shot does not prevent you from getting infected with the virus or proclaiming. “Vaccinated” people are just as contagious as unvaccinated people. Even if they have fewer or milder symptoms, their viral load is simply as great when infected, according to the CDC.
There’s No Control Group to Compare Against Anymore.
For some inexplicable reason, government leaders and health officials desire a needle in every arm, and they don’t care what the adverse effects of the shots may be. This is apparent by the fact that we now have tens of countless reported deaths (according to one whistleblower, 45,000 deaths have happened within three days of injection) and well over half a million injury reports following COVID “vaccination,” yet no action is taken to slow down or stop the campaign.
Historically, mass vaccination projects have been halted and drugs were withdrawn after 25 to 50 deaths (depending on the product). We’re so far past that now, one questions if there is a limit at which authorities will take action to protect the general public from unneeded medical injury and death.
VAERS is difficult to navigate, so the most convenient method to get a look into your current status is to go to OpenVAERS.com, where you get a basic summary breakdown of existing COVID-related reports.
Similarly informing is the fact that all control groups have been eliminated from the still-ongoing injection trials with complete support from a World Health Organization Expert Working Group, so in the end, we’ll have no other way of assessing negative effects.
The best way to hide the facts about these shots is to violate the real basics of what a security trial has constantly been required to have. You simply should incorporate a control group to compare the impacts of the drug against in the long-term, otherwise, you will have no hint regarding what issues have emerged.
Security evaluations have also been intentionally undermined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which selected not to require vaccine makers to implement robust post-injection information collection and follow-up on the basic public.
On top of that, the trials do not appear to have oversight boards, which is standard practice for all human scientific trials. There’s no Data Safety Monitoring Board, no Clinical Event Committee, and no Clinical Ethics Committee. How could this be?
If vaccine makers just forgot to follow basic practices, it would suggest we’re dealing with a truly incredible level of incompetence, as all COVID jab developers have made the same error. Which might be worse in this case? Deliberate carelessness or unintentional incompetence?
COVID-19 Shots Confer Narrow Immunity.
Going back to the problem of whether the COVID jab gives better security against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, it is extremely unlikely to see how the shot provides an extremely narrow and particular type of security, whereas natural immunity is broad.
When it pertains to SARS-CoV-2 — which is a genetically manipulated virus developed to assault your cardiovascular system and fundamental immune function — the spike protein is the most dangerous part and functions as a contaminant in and of itself. This is why the spike protein was picked as the antigen in these shots. However, it’s also why many are having side effects from them.
When you get a COVID shot, your body is advised to produce the spike protein. In response, your body then produces antibodies against that spike protein. These antibodies acknowledge only the spike protein and not other parts of the infection.
When you recuperate from a natural infection, your body has antibodies versus all parts of the infection, so the spike protein plus 4 other proteins. In addition, you have memory T cells, which appear much more important than antibodies when it concerns fighting infections.
Does it make good sense that one type of antibody would be more reliable versus an infection that may have altered several of its proteins? Or is it most likely that having numerous kinds of antibodies plus memory T cells will offer higher security?
If you pay attention, you will discover that nobody ever offers a practical explanation regarding why a single anti-spike antibody would be much better than T cells and antibodies versus all parts of the infection.
Natural Immunity Is Robust and Long-Lasting.
Many research studies have been released showing that natural immunity versus SARS-CoV-2 is both robust and lasting. For example, a May 2020 study discovered 70% of samples from patients who had recuperated from moderate cases of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell level.
Surprisingly, 40% to 60% of people who had not been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 had resistance to the virus on the T-cell level. According to the authors, this suggests there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between distributing the coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2”.
A German paper concerned a comparable conclusion. Here, they found helper T cells that targeted the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in 15 out of 18 patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
What’s more, they discovered that patients who became infected with the initial SARS infection in 2003 still had memory T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2, despite the virus being only 80% comparable. This study suggests natural immunity is likely to last years, not months, like the COVID shot.
It all sounds confusing, right? Yeah, we know… it’s just, somehow Bat Shit wasn’t filtered out of the Bat Soup.